Adaptive High-Resolution Sensor Waveform Design for Tracking by Ioannis Kyriakides, Darryl Morrell, Antonia

By Ioannis Kyriakides, Darryl Morrell, Antonia Papandreou-Suppappola, Andreas Spanias

Contemporary thoughts in smooth radar for designing transmitted waveforms, coupled with new algorithms for adaptively determining the waveform parameters at every time step, have led to advancements in monitoring functionality. Of specific curiosity are waveforms that may be mathematically designed to have decreased ambiguity functionality sidelobes, as their use can result in a rise within the objective nation estimation accuracy. in addition, adaptively positioning the sidelobes can display vulnerable objective returns through decreasing interference from greater ambitions. The manuscript presents an summary of contemporary advances within the layout of multicarrier phase-coded waveforms in line with Bjorck constant-amplitude zero-autocorrelation (CAZAC) sequences to be used in an adaptive waveform choice scheme for mutliple goal monitoring. The adaptive waveform layout is formulated utilizing sequential Monte Carlo suggestions that have to be matched to the excessive solution measurements. The paintings might be of curiosity to either practitioners and researchers in radar in addition to to researchers in different functions the place excessive answer measurements may have major advantages. desk of Contents: creation / Radar Waveform layout / goal monitoring with a Particle filter out / unmarried objective monitoring with LFM and CAZAC Sequences / a number of aim monitoring / Conclusions

Show description

Read or Download Adaptive High-Resolution Sensor Waveform Design for Tracking (Synthesis Lectures on Algorith and Software in Engineering) PDF

Best electronics books

Building iPhone and iPad Electronic Projects: Real-World Arduino, Sensor, and Bluetooth Low Energy Apps in techBASIC

Why easily play tune or log on in case you can use your iPhone or iPad for a few rather enjoyable initiatives, akin to development a steel detector, hacking a radio regulate truck, or monitoring a version rocket in flight? the right way to construct those and different cool issues through the use of iOS gadget sensors and cheap comparable to Arduino and a Bluetooth Low strength (LE) protect.

Signal Processing for Intelligent Sensor Systems

Integrates a extensive variety of physics, algorithms, and sensing strategies for improvement of clever platforms together with frequency area processing, adaptive filtering, wavenumber platforms and sign processing functions, detailing adaptive least-squared errors modeling.

Extra resources for Adaptive High-Resolution Sensor Waveform Design for Tracking (Synthesis Lectures on Algorith and Software in Engineering)

Example text

The matched filter statistic yτ¯ ,¯ν ,u,k is exponentially distributed. Therefore, ⎧ y − τ¯ ,¯ν ,u,k ⎪ 2 ⎪ ⎨ 12 e σ1 , if target present σ1 yτ¯ ,¯ν ,u,k p(yτ¯ ,¯ν ,u,k |xk ) ∝ − ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ 12 e σ02 , if target not present. σ0 If we threshold the matched filter output, we have the following: y¯τ¯ ,¯ν ,u,k = 1, if yτ¯ ,¯ν ,u,k ≥ T 0, if yτ¯ ,¯ν ,u,k < T obtaining a detection (1) or no detection (0). We can calculate a threshold T = −2σ02 ln(Pf ), where ln is the natural logarithm, based on a probability of false alarm (Pf ).

The factor Al,k is a sum of random complex returns from many different target scatterers on target l, according to the Swerling I model [44]. Therefore, Al,k is assumed to be zero-mean, complex Gaussian with known variance 2 . In this work, it is assumed that we are tracking targets with different radar cross sections [47], 2σA,l therefore, targets with different strengths in their return signal. Here, the strength of the target is represented by the variance of Al,k . In this work, we assume that the strength of the return signal depends only on the target cross section and not the distance between the sensor and the target, which is compensated by the radar by amplifying more returns that arrive later in time.

We n n n ) N n n n ), approximate the likelihood for each partition to U xλ,k xλ,k u=1 p1 (yλ,u,k |˜ n=1,n=n p0 (yλ,u,k |˜ n n n n n n n where p1 (yλ,u,k |˜xλ,k ) denotes the likelihood that a target exists at x˜λ,k and p0 (yλ,u,k |˜xλ,k ) denotes n . , the n n n n closeness of τ˜λ,u,k , ν˜ λ,u,k and τ˜λ,u,k , ν˜ λ,u,k ) relative to the ambiguity function spread. Therefore, the measurement independence approximation is quite reasonable for the Björck CAZAC that has a concentrated ambiguity function.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.91 of 5 – based on 15 votes